Pareto Distribution Calculator

Calculate Type I Pareto probabilities, density, survival probability, percentiles, median, mean, variance, standard deviation, hazard rate, and the expected value above a threshold.

Pareto distribution calculator

Evaluate probabilities, tail risk, percentiles, and distribution moments.

Probability and tail results

CDF: P(X ≤ x)

93.5850%

Tail: P(X > x)

6.4150%

Density f(x)

0.05345836

95th percentile

3.31445402

Mode
1
Median
1.31950791
Mean
1.66666667
Variance
2.22222222
Standard deviation
1.49071198
Hazard rate at x
0.83333333
Expected value conditional on exceeding x
5

A shape parameter at or below 1 gives an infinite theoretical mean. A shape at or below 2 gives an infinite theoretical variance. These are mathematical properties of the heavy tail, not calculator errors.

Pareto Distribution Calculator Guide: CDF, PDF, Tail Probability, Percentiles, and Moments

The Type I Pareto distribution models positive quantities with a fixed lower bound and a long right tail. It is often used when most observations are relatively small but a few values can be many times larger than the minimum.

The model has two parameters: the minimum value xₘ, also called the scale, and a positive shape parameter α. Every modeled value must satisfy x ≥ xₘ.

The shape controls tail heaviness. A smaller positive α assigns more probability to extreme values. A larger α concentrates more probability near the minimum.

Unlike many familiar distributions, some Pareto moments may not exist. The mean is finite only when α > 1, and the variance is finite only when α > 2. Reporting those quantities as ordinary finite numbers outside their valid parameter ranges would be mathematically incorrect.

This calculator reports both the cumulative probability P(X ≤ x) and the survival probability P(X > x). The survival probability is particularly useful for risk questions because it directly expresses the chance of exceeding a chosen threshold.

How to Calculate a Type I Pareto Distribution

  1. Enter the minimum value: Use the known lower bound of the modeled quantity. It must be positive.
  2. Enter the shape parameter: Use a positive α estimated from data or specified by the model. Lower values represent a heavier tail.
  3. Enter the evaluation threshold: Choose x at or above the minimum to calculate the density, CDF, and exceedance probability.
  4. Choose a percentile: Enter a percentage between 0 and 100 to calculate its corresponding Pareto quantile.
  5. Check moment availability: Treat an undefined mean or variance as a property of the selected heavy-tailed model, not as missing calculator output.

Formula and variables

For x at or above the minimum xₘ, the density f(x) describes local probability concentration, the CDF F(x) gives the probability at or below x, the survival function gives the probability above x, and Q(p) returns the value associated with cumulative probability p.

f(x) = (α/x)(xₘ/x)^α; F(x) = 1 − (xₘ/x)^α; P(X > x) = (xₘ/x)^α; Q(p) = xₘ/(1 − p)^(1/α)
xₘMinimum or scale
The smallest possible modeled value; it must be greater than zero.
αShape parameter
A positive value that controls how quickly the right tail decays.
xEvaluation value
The threshold at which the density and probabilities are evaluated; x must be at least xₘ.
pCumulative probability
A probability strictly between 0 and 1 used to calculate a percentile or quantile.

Example: Evaluate a Pareto model at three times its minimum

A Type I Pareto model has minimum xₘ = 1 and shape α = 2.5. Evaluate the distribution at x = 3 and calculate the 95th percentile.

Minimum xₘ
1
Shape α
2.5
Evaluation value x
3
Percentile
95%
  1. P(X > 3) = (1/3)^2.5 ≈ 0.06415.
  2. F(3) = 1 − 0.06415 ≈ 0.93585.
  3. f(3) = (2.5/3) × 0.06415 ≈ 0.05346.
  4. Q(0.95) = 1/(0.05)^(1/2.5) ≈ 3.3145.

Result: Approximately 93.585% of modeled values are at or below 3, about 6.415% exceed 3, and the 95th percentile is approximately 3.3145.

The exceedance probability remains meaningful even when assessing an unusually large threshold. Because α = 2.5 is above 2, both the theoretical mean and variance are finite in this example.

Understanding your results

CDF and survival probability answer opposite threshold questions

The CDF is the probability that X is at or below the selected x. The survival probability is the probability that X exceeds x. They should add to 1 apart from display rounding.

A density is not a point probability

For a continuous distribution, f(x) is a density measured per unit of x. The probability of X being exactly one point is zero; probabilities apply to intervals and are calculated from the CDF.

Undefined moments signal extreme tail behavior

When α ≤ 1, the theoretical mean diverges. When α ≤ 2, the variance diverges. A finite sample can still have a sample average and variance, but those sample statistics do not make the corresponding population moments finite.

The conditional mean describes loss beyond a threshold

When α > 1, E[X | X > x] equals αx/(α − 1). This describes the expected magnitude after the threshold has already been exceeded and can reveal risk hidden by exceedance probability alone.

Assumptions

  • The calculator uses the Type I Pareto distribution with support x ≥ xₘ.
  • The minimum xₘ and shape α are treated as known model parameters rather than estimates derived from a sample.
  • Inputs use one consistent unit; probabilities are unitless, while quantiles and moments inherit the input unit.
  • Observations are assumed to follow the selected Pareto model independently when the results are applied to a dataset.

Limitations

  • The calculator does not estimate α or xₘ from raw observations and does not perform a goodness-of-fit test.
  • A Pareto model should not be selected only because data are right-skewed; alternative heavy-tailed distributions may fit better.
  • Very high percentiles can be sensitive to small changes in α and may carry substantial parameter uncertainty.
  • The calculator models a continuous distribution and is not a substitute for domain-specific financial, insurance, or safety analysis.

Common mistakes

  • Entering an evaluation value below the minimum xₘ.
  • Treating the PDF value as the probability of one exact outcome.
  • Using 95 instead of 0.95 inside a hand-calculated quantile formula.
  • Reporting a finite mean when α ≤ 1 or a finite variance when α ≤ 2.
  • Assuming every power-law-looking dataset follows a Type I Pareto distribution.
  • Rounding the survival probability before calculating other tail quantities.

Practical use cases

Insurance and operational risk

Analysts may use a Pareto model for positive loss sizes above a selected minimum when rare large losses dominate tail risk.

  • Exceedance probability
  • High-loss percentiles
  • Conditional loss beyond a threshold

Economics, demand, and concentration

Pareto models can represent highly unequal positive quantities, but the parameter choice should be supported by data and diagnostic checks.

Reliability and event-size modeling

The survival function can quantify how often an event magnitude is expected to exceed a specified level under the fitted model.

Continue planning

Frequently asked questions

What is a Pareto distribution?

It is a continuous distribution with a positive lower bound and a right tail that decays according to a power law.

What does the Pareto shape parameter mean?

The positive shape α controls tail heaviness. Lower α values place more probability on very large outcomes.

Why is the Pareto mean sometimes undefined?

For α ≤ 1, the tail is heavy enough that the population expectation does not converge to a finite number.

Why is the Pareto variance sometimes undefined?

The population variance is finite only when α > 2. For smaller shapes, extreme outcomes contribute too strongly for the second moment to converge.

What is the difference between the CDF and survival function?

The CDF gives P(X ≤ x), while the survival function gives P(X > x). For this continuous model, the two values sum to 1.

Can the minimum value be zero?

Not in the Type I parameterization used here. The scale xₘ must be strictly positive.

Is a Pareto distribution the same as the 80/20 rule?

They are historically related ideas, but a Pareto probability distribution is a specific mathematical model. An 80/20 split does not by itself identify the distribution or determine α.

How should I choose α?

Estimate it from suitable observations above a justified minimum threshold, then evaluate model fit and parameter uncertainty. This calculator evaluates supplied parameters; it does not estimate them.

Sources and review

Reviewed 2026-09-01 by Dr Akawak Ejigu, DBA.

Continue with calculators that answer nearby questions and help compare the next step.